Most Active Stories
- The Louisiana Coast: Last Call — The Shape We're In Now
- The Louisiana Coast: Last Call — How We Got This Way: The Mississippi River
- Bring Your Own Presents: 'Virginia'
- Dirty Diapers Pile Up In Portland Recycling Bins: 'It's Not Pretty'
- As With Dalai Lama Today, Pope's Visit To New Orleans 25 Years Ago Came Amid Violence
It's All Politics
Wed April 25, 2012
Immigration Debate Arrives At Supreme Court, And With It A Multitude Of Voices
Originally published on Thu April 26, 2012 8:24 am
A chorus of voices rang out Wednesday on the steps of the Supreme Court building, where justices were hearing arguments about Arizona's controversial immigration law. But the demonstrators were singing from many different hymnals.
At one spot, songs and chants in English and Spanish called on the court to strike down the law.
At another, supporters of State Bill 1070 unfurled flags of the United States, Arizona and the Tea Party.
Later in the morning, as oral arguments began inside, clergy members opposed to the law circled the building in a self-titled "Jericho Walk," while others held up images of the Virgin of Guadalupe and Jesus.
The law was intended to curb illegal immigration in a border state, and it has ignited a broader national discussion about federalism, legal and illegal immigration, discrimination and racial profiling.
NPR discussed the experience — and the issues surrounding the law — with people who traveled from around the country to the steps of the high court Wednesday. Here is some of that discussion:
Pastor Warren H. Stewart Sr., opposes SB 1070:
"I'm here because this is a justice issue ... This whole movement is like deja vu for the civil rights movement 50, 60 years ago. I mean, blacks used to be racially profiled and now Latinos are. ... It has been my task to share with leaders in the African-American community and in the faith community that this is an issue because it is a biblical issue, an issue of biblical justice."
Michael McLaughlin, supports SB 1070:
"A lot of this is being used as a political opportunism for people to create racial divisiveness, which to me is not what the American people are about. I think we're the most tolerant people on the face of the Earth when it comes to other races and other people. I've lived 25 years of my life overseas. I'm not against other cultures ... but I think that we have to assimilate immigrants when they come here, and that's my greatest fear that we're not assimilating them like we used to."
Rosa Cabezas, opposes SB 1070:
"SB 1070 has been racially profiling my family, my community and all the Latino community all over the country. [My father] went to look for work in California, and at the state line he was detained, and he was racial-profiled, and he was being charged for drug smuggling, but they could never find real good evidence to say that ... He has a work permit. He has an Arizona driver's license."
Benjamin Williams, supports SB 1070:
"I feel that through the 10th Amendment, it supports Arizona, because it's the right of the state to make their own laws that are applicable to them, and it's not [up to] the federal government to dictate what they say or not. It's really [Arizona's] choice."
Ole Martin, opposes SB 1070:
"I don't think it's morally right. ... Since I'm from Norway and Europe, we have free travel all over Europe where we don't have to show passport for when you're crossing the borders, necessarily, so to me it seems kind of silly."
Larry Dever, Sheriff of Cochise County, Ariz., supports SB 1070:
"I absolutely support SB 1070. In fact, I'm the ... guy who started it all ... The judge's questions were excellent, pointed to both parties, and they extracted what we hoped they would hear in the long run. You can only guess what they're going to do, but I feel pretty confident we're going to come with at least a good portion of the law intact."